Lighting Liberty's Lamp – A (Mostly) True Story

All EditorialsThe American Dream

Lighting Liberty's Lamp – A (Mostly) True Story

August 6, 2026Lloyd Leighton

The year was 2076 and excitement was in the air. Americans were reflecting on our past while preparing to celebrate our nation's 300th birthday.


In the beginning, there arose a group of patriots, Friends of Liberty. They stood for their God given rights and rejected the oppression of King George III. Those patriots lit the lamp of liberty on July 4, 1776 with the signing of the Declaration of Independence. They risked everything including their lives. Patrick Henry was among them and declared, "As for me, give me liberty or give me death."


87 Years later, Abraham Lincoln stood on the battlefield at Gettysburg and spoke eloquently of a nation "conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."


The lamp of liberty burned bright for another 100+ years. Slaves were freed, the 14th and 15th Amendments expanded individual freedoms, and the 19th Amendment gave women the vote. Limited government, liberty and free markets created a level of prosperity the world had never seen. Americans of all races and genders thrived. America was the envy of the world – the shining city on the hill with California as its crown jewel.


But the winds of change were blowing by the early 1970's. A new breed of politicians, the Czars of Control, were on the rise in California. The Czars of Control ignored the progress America had made in nearly 200 years. They only saw America's faults and preached a message of doom and gloom. They claimed that larger government and more laws were needed to combat injustice and deliver liberty and equality. The lamp of liberty grew dimmer. For them, liberty became a word without meaning. We still spoke of liberty. It's in our pledge of allegiance – "…with liberty and justice for all" but times had changed. Our government, as envisioned by our forefathers with its broad freedom to let people live their lives as they saw fit was being lost.


The next half century was a dark time. The size and power of government grew rapidly. The czars dominated California politics controlling the state senate, assembly and the governorship. Cries for "Affirmative Action," "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion," "make the wealthy pay their fair share," and "hold companies accountable" were among the catch phrases used to justify an endless succession of new laws.


The SEIU, CTA and other large labor unions became the puppeteers that controlled the czars with wheelbarrows of campaign cash. "Public/private partnerships" and a "Train to Nowhere" became favored pathways for shipping billions of dollars to politically aligned NGO's (non-governmental organizations) and other groups. The czars had imposed the highest personal income taxes, the 7th highest sales taxes and the 6th highest corporate taxes in the nation by 2026. They also shifted costs from the state onto the backs of local governments by, among other things, closing prisons and sending inmates to county jails. Still, those changes weren't enough to feed the bloated government they created. Budget deficits replaced surpluses even as tax revenue skyrocketed. Their deficits caused unfunded pension liabilities for Cal PERS and Cal STRS to balloon to over $265 billion.


Crime, including serial retail theft and drug dealing, was growing but the czars refused to even take up the issue in the Assembly and Senate Public Safety committees. The people responded! Nearly 70% voted to reign in crime by passing Proposition 36. The governor and other czars just thumbed their noses and refused to fund it.


The czars fought tooth and nail against making it a felony to traffic teenagers for sex. They voted for early parole of sex offenders over age 50 calling it "Elderly Parole."


The czars used "Holding corporations accountable" to rationalize micromanaging the insurance industry. Insurers abandoned the state. Others stopped writing new home insurance policies. The insurance crisis that followed saw costs surge for individuals, businesses and local governments. The oil industry also fell victim to the czars' regulation. Two major refineries closed.


The czars' planning laws led to a housing bubble in the early 2000's and a devastating collapse in 2007. That was followed by years of inadequate building and a housing shortage. Warning bells and recommendations from the California Legislative Analyst in 2015 went unheeded. California had the highest home prices in the nation and nearly the highest rents by 2026. The czars were blind to their culpability. They audaciously boasted of having passed over 500 housing related laws in the 7 years leading up to 2026. Their folly was to measure success by the number of laws they passed and the amount of money they spent - not by their results. The Housing Affordability Index (HAI) then stood at 19 (just 19% of households could afford the median priced home) versus 40 for the nation.


Dennis and Shelley Gallagher watch the Statue of Liberty on TV with their son James, with the caption 'Never Stop Fighting For Her' — illustration by Randy Johnson, 2026

California had the third highest cost of living in the nation. Unemployment was the highest in the nation. Middle and lower income families, the elderly, minorities, other vulnerable groups and local governments struggled under the weight of the czars' oppressive rule.


The czars supported laws that allowed boys to compete in girls' sports and to shower with them. They made it illegal for teachers and school administrators to notify the parents of children considering transitioning to a different sex. They sued school districts that refused to comply with their mandates.


One of the leading czars was Senate Leader Mike McGuire. He even supported a corrupt, backroom deal to draw new Congressional district lines after demanding that a district be drawn especially for him. The czars were running roughshod over the people.


Meanwhile, life had gone on in the hamlet of Rio Oso, California – population 372. In 1981, Dennis and Shelley Gallagher, farmers and Friends of Liberty, gave birth to their son James. The young Gallagher grew to be an intelligent, determined and upright man. He was elected to the Sutter County board of Supervisors. His stature grew. He was elected to the California Assembly and became a true leader of the Friends of Liberty.


Gallagher was honest and solution oriented. He was well-liked, respected and worked across party lines in the Assembly. The untimely death of his good friend and mentor, 1st Congressional District Congressman Doug LaMalfa, led to James' election to Congress. In Congress, he worked together with Democratic Congressman Mike Thompson to address northern California issues.


The stage was set. Mike McGuire would face James Gallagher in the newly gerrymandered 1st Congressional District. The battle would turn on three critical points. Could McGuire disguise his abysmal record by changing the subject anytime his record was mentioned? Would his game of hide and seek to avoid debating Gallagher succeed? Would the Friends of Liberty turn out in great enough numbers to overcome the numerical disadvantage from McGuire's gerrymandering?


The Friends of Liberty were angry. Gallagher, "The Fighting Irishman," gave the word. "Join the fight. No Retreat. No Surrender."


To be continued …


Lloyd Leighton is a Realtor. He served as the National Association of Realtors federal political contact to Congressman Doug LaMalfa. He is the former chairman of the Sutter County Republican Central Committee.


Have Questions About the Market?

Lloyd has decades of experience in the Yuba City real estate market. Give him a call.